This is a sticky question. If I give a Christian answer or an answer from scripture, I will be accused of preaching (Jon Hill’s answer to Do people hate Trump?). If I keep it “secular”, no answer would make any sense!

Since I have yet to be reprimanded by Quora admin for “preaching”, I will go ahead and give what I believe to be a reason from scripture.

One problem is that it depends on what you mean by “unite”. We ARE united with our persecuted Christian brothers and sisters around the world in prayer, financial contributions and assistance, and pressure on our government to in turn put pressure (i.e. sanctions) on nations that persecute Christians or which do not prosecute people who do. These are the limits of what we can do, though. If, however, you mean to unite in violent retribution for persecution, I’m afraid that that is diametrically opposed to the teachings of Jesus Christ and the Apostles! Sure, there are some “Christians” who do take vengeance, some of them will even do it—and worse—“in the name of Jesus”! But this does not make their actions Christian or defensible. A Christian who exacts vengeance, forces conversion, or commits any number of crimes against humanity as have been committed “in Christ’s name”, has to violate the very teachings of his faith in order to do so! It would be like chowing down on a suckling pig and chasing it with a bottle of vodka “in the name of Islam”!

The other problem, if you wish to call it that—and many American evangelicals don’t really like to hear this—is that persecution for a Christian is a blessing, not a curse! “Blessed are those who are persecuted because of righteousness, for theirs is the kingdom of heaven.

“Blessed are you when people insult you, persecute you and falsely say all kinds of evil against you because of me. Rejoice and be glad, because great is your reward in heaven, for in the same way they persecuted the prophets who were before you.” (Matthew 5:10:12); “Not only that, but we also rejoice in our sufferings, because we know that suffering produces perseverance…” (Romans 5:3); “For it has been granted to you on behalf of Christ not only to believe in Him, but also to suffer for Him…” (Philippians 1:29) This verse actually says our suffering for Jesus is a gift! “Consider it pure joy, my brothers and sisters, whenever you face trials of many kinds, because you know that the testing of your faith produces perseverance.” (James 1:2–3); “Indeed, all who desire to live a godly life in Christ Jesus will be persecuted, while evildoers and impostors will go from bad to worse, deceiving and being deceived.” (2 Timothy 3:12–13) (All emphases are mine)

Related image

Persecution in the early church was a part of life. Roman emperors would often require subjects to worship them; if they did not, horrible punishments would await. “No Roman was more ruthless than Nero when it came to the persecution of Christians. He did not just kill Christians; he wanted to make them suffer first. Nero enjoyed dipping the Christians in wax before impaling them on poles around his palace and lighting them on fire, yelling sarcastically, ‘Now, you truly are the light of the world!’

“Nero used the Circus Maximus for some of his most gruesome murders. In that massive stadium he would have Christians wrapped in animal skins and thrown to lions or dogs that would then tear them apart in front of thousands of entertained spectators. At other times he would crucify them and after the crowd would get bored, set the Christians on fire.” (Spectators in the Circus Maximus)

We are to have the mind and attitude of Jesus Christ, as difficult as it may be for the “world” to grasp: “When he was reviled, he did not revile in return; when he suffered, he did not threaten, but continued entrusting himself to him who judges justly.” (1 Peter 2:23)


What do you think of Donald Trump being the president? It’s an execrable thing. He is the worst we have ever had, by far. The man has no morals; he is wholly dedicated only to the god Trump. Nothing concerns him except what he believes will be beneficial to him.

Do you think it’s accurate how people say he reminds America of Hitler? Yes…and no. Dan Hodges wrote an excellent article in the New Statesman in an attempt to address the conservative canard that Hitler was a socialist. His conclusion is that this is a way of thinking that is too easy and lazy, and ignores the reality. You can read the article for his reasons, but what stuck with me is what it was he said about Hitler that does remind me of Trump:

“Anyone who has studied Hitler’s rise to power knows he was no socialist. He was an opportunist, even a political schizophrenic…Pin the ideology on the Führer is a fun game. Actually, it’s quite a tasteless game. But we can all play it…But does it matter? Yes, it does, actually. Hitler wasn’t a socialist, nor was he a conservative. He was a political mutation. And to try to place him anywhere on the conventional political spectrum is not just to abuse history but to play a dangerous game with the future.”

“(Don’t ever call Hitler a socialist)

Image result for trump hitler

I was stunned! All you need to do is substitute “Trump” for Hitler and you get exactly the same truth:

“Anyone who has studied Trump’s rise to power knows he is no socialist (Democrat). He is an opportunist, even a political schizophrenic…Pin the ideology on the Trump is a fun game. Actually, it’s quite a tasteless game. But we can all play it…But does it matter? Yes, it does, actually. Trump isn’t a socialist (Democrat), nor is he a conservative (Republican). He is a political mutation. And to try to place him anywhere on the conventional political spectrum is not just to abuse history but to play a dangerous game with the future.”

All that said, Trump does exhibit fascistic affinities: “Fascism is a form of radical authoritarian nationalism, characterized by dictatorial power, forcible suppression of opposition and control of industry and commerce.” (Fascism – Wikipedia)

(1) Authoritarian nationalism: He has declared himself to be the only person who can save America and one of his campaign slogans is borrowed straight from the American Nazi sympathizers pre-WW II: “America First!”

(2) Dictatorial power: He has demonstrated an extreme dislike, even hatred, for the limitations the Constitution places on the powers of the presidency. He despises the courts, unless they rule the ways he wants, and hates even a Congress which is run by his own party for not rubber-stamping his every whim and fancy.

(3) Forcible suppression of opposition: He is actively searching for ways to circumvent or stop a legitimate investigation into criminal behavior by members of his administration and hopes to control the free press, to punish them for exposing damaging truths about him and his administrations.

(4) Control of industry and commerce? He exhibits less of this tendency specifically, but so far, industry and commerce are all in bed with him, so there is little reason for him to complain.

Hodges finishes off with a warning. Note that the article was written in 2013, before anyone thought Trump would run for office:

“Hitler has gone but his progeny are very much alive. In Hungary, they are calling for a register of Jews to be drawn up. One, a mass murderer, is languishing in a Norwegian jail. A few are pushing their leaflets through the front doors on east London housing estates.

“There is one thing political extremists crave more than anything else and that is entry to the mainstream – and by branding such people ‘socialists’ or ‘conservatives’ we unlatch the door and pull back the bolt.

“Hitler was Hitler, a grotesque one-off. Or he will be, if we avoid bestowing unnecessary respectability on those who dream of following him.” (ibid.)

According to Paul, the dead in Christ will rise first, then those of us who are alive will be caught up. “According to the Lord’s word, we tell you that we who are still alive, who are left until the coming of the Lord, will certainly not precede those who have fallen asleep. For the Lord himself will come down from heaven, with a loud command, with the voice of the archangel and with the trumpet call of God, and the dead in Christ will rise first. After that, we who are still alive and are left will be caught up together with them in the clouds to meet the Lord in the air. And so we will be with the Lord forever.” (1 Thessalonians 4:15–17) Looks to me like it will be all at once.

Extra credit:

If you compare texts, Jesus says in Matthew 24:4–29 that God’s people will face terrible tribulation until, in vss 30–31, “Then will appear the sign of the Son of Man in heaven. And then all the peoples of the earth will mourn when they see the Son of Man coming on the clouds of heaven, with power and great glory. And he will send his angels with a loud trumpet call, and they will gather his elect from the four winds, from one end of the heavens to the other.” Then, in 1 Thessalonians 4:16–17, “For the Lord himself will come down from heaven, with a loud command, with the voice of the archangel and with the trumpet call of God, and the dead in Christ will rise first. After that, we who are still alive and are left will be caught up together with them in the clouds to meet the Lord in the air. And so we will be with the Lord forever.” In chapter 1, verse 10, we read, “and to wait for his Son from heaven, whom he raised from the dead—Jesus, who rescues us from the coming wrath.” Finally, in Revelation 11:15, the seventh trumpet is sounded:

Image result for 7th trumpet

“The seventh angel sounded his trumpet, and there were loud voices in heaven, which said:

“The kingdom of the world has become

the kingdom of our Lord and of his Messiah,

and he will reign for ever and ever.”

Note what one of the things the 24 elders proclaim in vs 18:

“The nations were angry,

and your wrath has come.

The time has come for judging the dead,

and for rewarding your servants the prophets

and your people who revere your name,

both great and small—

and for destroying those who destroy the earth.”

The next few chapters are “asides”, like cul de sacs. The seventh trumpet actually announces the seven angels with the seven last plagues in chapter 15—“last, because with them God’s wrath is completed.” (vs 1) Indeed, the seven last plagues are the the Seven Bowls of God’s Wrath.

What does this tell us?

  1. There will be a period of tribulation for God’s people (Matthew 24:4–29)
  2. This will not be God’s “wrath”, for we are told in 1 Thessalonians 1:10 that we will escape God’s wrath. His wrath is reserved for those who ultimately reject him even after absolute proof of his existence is presented and “for destroying those who destroy the earth.” (Revelation 11:18)
  3. The trumpet of God will sound (Matthew 24:31; 1 Thessalonians 4:16; Revelation 11:15).
  4. The dead in Christ will rise.
  5. Those Christians left alive will rise.
  6. Finally, God’s wrath will be unloosed on all who remain.
  7. Armageddon
  8. The final fall of “Babylon the Great”.
  9. The “Beast” is defeated.
  10. Christ’s thousand year reign.
  11. Judgement of Satan
  12. Judgment of the dead
  13. New heaven and new earth
  14. New Jerusalem
  15. The marriage feast: Christ and his Bride, a pure and holy, spotless Church!
  16. Eden restored!

Because what he did was in direct contradiction to the teachings of Christianity, besides, calling oneself a duck does not make one a duck; it makes one nuts.

“One day an evangelist by the name of Jakov arrived in a certain village. He commiserated with an elderly man named Cimmerman on the tragedies he had experienced and talked to him of the love of Christ. Cimmerman abruptly interrupted Jakov and told him that he wished to have nothing to do with Christianity. He reminded Jakov of the dreadful history of the church in his town, a history replete with plundering, exploiting, and indeed with killing innocent people. “My own nephew was killed by them,” he said and angrily rebuffed any effort on Jakov’s part to talk about Christ. ‘They wear those elaborate coats and caps and crosses,’ he said, ‘signifying a heavenly commission, but their evil designs and lives I cannot ignore.’

“Jakov, looking for an occasion to get Cimmerman to change his line of thinking, said, ‘Cimmerman, can I ask you a question? Suppose I were to steal your coat, put it on, and break into a bank. Suppose further that the police sighted me running in the distance but could not catch up with me. One clue, however, put them onto your track; they recognized your coat. What would you say to them if they came to your house and accused you of breaking into the bank?’

“ ‘I would deny it,’ said Cimmerman.

“‘ “Ah, but we saw your coat,” they would say,’ retorted Jakov. This analogy quite annoyed Cimmerman, who ordered Jakov to leave his home.

“Jakov continued to return to the village periodically just to befriend Cimmerman, encourage him, and share the love of Christ, with him. Finally one day Cimmerman asked, ‘How does one become a Christian?’ and Jakov taught him the simple steps of repentance for sin and of trust in the work of Jesus Christ and gently pointed him to the Shepherd of his soul. Cimmerman bent his knee on the soil with his head bowed and surrendered his life to Christ. As he rose to his feet, wiping his tears, he embraced Jakov and said, ‘Thank you for being in my life.’ And then he pointed to the heavens and whispered, ‘You wear His coat very well.’” (You Wear His Coat Very Well)

You see, we Christians are too familiar with liars and false prophets. We’ve been warned about them from the beginning: “Watch out for false prophets. They come to you in sheep’s clothing, but inwardly they are ferocious wolves. By their fruit you will recognize them. Do people pick grapes from thornbushes, or figs from thistles? Likewise, every good tree bears good fruit, but a bad tree bears bad fruit. A good tree cannot bear bad fruit, and a bad tree cannot bear good fruit. Every tree that does not bear good fruit is cut down and thrown into the fire. Thus, by their fruit you will recognize them.” (Matthew 7:15–20)

What kind of “fruit” did Hitler bear? Was it good fruit? Was it love? Joy? Peace? Patience, kindness, kindness, goodness, faithfulness, gentleness, self-control? These are the fruit Christians will bear; furthermore, “And those who belong to Christ Jesus have crucified the flesh with its passions and desires.” (Galatians 5:24) Does Hitler sound like the kind of man who crucified his flesh with its passions and desires?

Later on, Paul warned us: “People will be lovers of themselves, lovers of money, boastful, proud, abusive, disobedient to their parents, ungrateful, unholy, without love, unforgiving, slanderous, without self-control, brutal, not lovers of the good, treacherous, rash, conceited, lovers of pleasure rather than lovers of God— having a form of godliness but denying its power. Have nothing to do with such people.” (2 Timothy 3:2–5) See the part I emphasized? These people, whether they turned out to be Crusaders, Inquisitors, Popes…Nazis…all had “a form” or an appearance of godliness; they talked a bit of the talk but walked none of the walk.

Doing evil “in the name of Christianity” is a logical absurdity! It would be like saying “I’m going to chow down on this suckling pig and chase it with a bottle of scotch in the name of Islam!” Or someone who believes in God calling themselves an atheist!

“That dog won’t hunt”, my friend!

Image result for that dog won't hunt

Anybody who has not been aware of the depths of depravity in Hollywood since forever has been in a coma, so stop with this “now that the curtain has been pulled back” bit. How about “Now that the curtain has been pulled back, and the depths of depravity revealed in Washington, will there be any consequences for all politicians? Aren’t political campaigns & endorsements forever tainted by the broken & abused who were forever scarred?” Right now, we have a Republican sexual predator campaigning for another Republican sexual predator (who preyed on minors), and “the base” is just fine, because “judges and all that, you know?”

Guess what?

“There is no one righteous, not even one;

there is no one who understands;

there is no one who seeks God.

All have turned away,

they have together become worthless;

there is no one who does good,

not even one.”

“Their throats are open graves;

their tongues practice deceit.”

“The poison of vipers is on their lips.”

“Their mouths are full of cursing and bitterness.”

“Their feet are swift to shed blood;

ruin and misery mark their ways,

and the way of peace they do not know.”

“There is no fear of God before their eyes.”

(Romans 3:10–18)

We want to divide the world into us and them: Our group is the good guys; theirs is the bad. The Democrats are of Satan; Republicans are the party of God; Democrats are weak, don’t care about the unborn, want to give money to lazy people and welfare queens; Republicans are cruel, don’t give a damn about the “lucky to be born”, favor the wealthy, will allow the sick to die and the poor to starve…blah, blah, blah…


images (12)images (13)

Not Nazi Germany; the Soviet Union Gulag

When he was rotting in the Gulag, the Soviet Union concentration camps, Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn came to know Jesus Christ. It was there that he realized something deeply profound:

“If only it were all so simple! If only there were evil people somewhere insidiously committing evil deeds, and it were necessary only to separate them from the rest of us and destroy them…It was only when I lay there on the rotting prison straw that I sensed within myself the first stirrings of good. Gradually it was disclosed to me that the line separating good and evil passes not between states nor between social classes nor between political parties, but right through every human heart, through all human hearts…And who is willing to destroy a piece of his own heart? And that is why I turn back to the years of my imprisonment and say, sometimes to the astonishment of those about me, bless you, prison, for having been a part of my life.**

* This excerpt is from “The Gulag Archipelago: 1918-1956” by Alexander Solzhenitsyn

**I have taken the liberty of combining two nearly identical quotes.


Basically, it appears that he is saying that Christians, those who accept “the authority of scripture”, must accept what scripture says about the death penalty rather than what culture says. If he also means Jews, who accept the authority of the Old Testament, the answer would be a simple, “Yup!”

BUT…if he means Christians, it’s not that cut and dried:


“You have heard that it was said to the people long ago, ‘You shall not murder,a and anyone who murders will be subject to judgment.’ But I tell you that anyone who is angry with a brother or sister will be subject to judgment. Again, anyone who says to a brother or sister, ‘Raca,’* is answerable to the court. And anyone who says, ‘You fool!’** will be in danger of the fire of hell.” (Matthew 5:21–22)


“You have heard that it was said, ‘You shall not commit adultery.’ But I tell you that anyone who looks at a woman lustfully has already committed adultery with her in his heart. If your right eye causes you to stumble, gouge it out and throw it away. It is better for you to lose one part of your body than for your whole body to be thrown into hell. And if your right hand causes you to stumble, cut it off and throw it away. It is better for you to lose one part of your body than for your whole body to go into hell.

“It has been said, ‘Anyone who divorces his wife must give her a certificate of divorce.’ But I tell you that anyone who divorces his wife, except for sexual immorality, makes her the victim of adultery, and anyone who marries a divorced woman commits adultery.” (5:27–32) (1)

Finally, he said, “You have heard that it was said, ‘Eye for eye, and tooth for tooth.’ But I tell you, do not resist an evil person. If anyone slaps you on the right cheek, turn to them the other cheek also.” (5:38–39) Preachers will say, but since he didn’t specifically include “life for life” here, he didn’t mean that. Well, he also didn’t include “hand for hand, foot for foot, burn for burn, wound for wound, bruise for bruise.”

Image result for Eye for eye, and tooth for tooth.

So, we have two capital crimes mentioned just in Matthew 5, and Jesus basically says we are all guilty of both. Who wants to be the first to volunteer to be stoned? Plus, we are not to return evil with evil; if we are not to even resist the man who slaps us, how are we to deal with the criminal?

For good or ill, we DO live in a country that has an alternative to the death penalty: life or life without parole. Both allow one thing the death penalty does not: the possibility of correction for human error. So if the person quoted was arguing for the death penalty as being the only “Christian” alternative to capital crimes, I would have to at least offer that it is not so absolute.

One last word. Anyone who claims the Bible mandates death for murder must also mandate death for adultery, homosexual acts, idolatry, blaspheming God, rebellion against parents, cursing parents, working on the Sabbath, practicing witchcraft, kidnapping…I think the population of the US would decrease by several million if we were to get Biblical on crime! (2)

*Of Chaldee origin (compare reyq); O empty one, i.e. Thou worthless (as a term of utter vilification) — Raca. (4469. ῥακά (rhaka) — empty (an expression of contempt))

**moros. Sound familiar? Ever call someone a “moron”? Eeek! We’re all going to hell! (Jk!)

Regardless, however, of what scripture says—and I definitely accept the authority of scripture, as is obvious, I would submit, as I have often, that since we—humans—are terribly imperfect, despite our intelligence and awesome forensic science, the only way to be absolutely certain that no innocent person is ever killed by mistake is by abolishing the death penalty. Blackstone’s formula states: “For the law holds, that it is better that ten guilty persons escape, than that one innocent suffer”, a sentiment shared by Voltaire and Benjamin Franklin. I would further submit that it is better for ten-thousand persons to be confined to prison for life than for one innocent person to be killed.

(1) Interestingly, the context of this verse isn’t about “murder”, it’s about injury if there is a fight and a pregnant woman either has a miscarriage or gives birth prematurely: “If people are fighting and hit a pregnant woman and she gives birth prematurely but there is no serious injury, the offender must be fined whatever the woman’s husband demands and the court allows. But if there is serious injury, you are to take life for life, eye for eye, tooth for tooth, hand for hand, foot for foot, burn for burn, wound for wound, bruise for bruise.” (Exodus 21:22–25)

(2) I am not arguing here for or against pacifism. I am not saying these things are no longer sin; I am saying that not every sin should be criminal, and that no sin/crime must be punishable by death.

I cannot help but at least nod occasionally to the Christian God, because he has attributes that no other “god” has, but I will try to keep my arguments as non-sectarian as possible.

  1. Existence exists. Either the universe had a beginning, or it has always existed. If it had a beginning, there would have been a first cause. Either the first cause was ex nihilo, “There was nothing, then there was something”, that’s all we need to accept; or something or someone brought the universe into existence. I submit that the first cause was the act of creation by a God who exists (“I AM”), but who by nature exists outside ALL of the confines of his creation, including the demands from his creation for “proof”*. If you cannot understand that the creation declares the existence of a Creator NO AMOUNT OF “OBJECTIVE” TRUTH WILL SUFFICE to prove the existence of God. If the universe is infinite, the Law of Entropy surely would mean that we would be in a state of infinite heat death. Time would be irrelevant; it would not exist. We could not say, “we would be in a state of infinite heat death by now because “now” would be meaningless. Imagine an infinite number of red books, and an infinite number of blue books; now, completely destroy one of the red books (I’m not arguing that anything can or cannot be completely destroyed…annihilated, so don’t go there!). Are there now more blue books than red books? Does the sentence ∞ > ∞-1 make sense? Yes. It makes grammatical sense, but does it really mean anything? Not really.
  2. The moral argument. Let me say right away that I do not argue that atheists cannot be moral people. I would never say they do not know right from wrong. In a limited way, God has written morality on each person’s heart. What I will argue is the atheists have no foundation for their morality that is not the philosophical equivalent of quicksand. They cannot justify morality. If there is no objective measurement of evil, then it becomes merely an opinion; actions become “bad” based on feeling, either emotional or physical. It has been claimed that Nietzsche’s path to insanity (apart, perhaps from his syphilis), began when he saw a man beating a horse. “…While in an open air market in Turin, Nietzsche witnessed a merchant flogging a horse. He ran to the animal and yelled for the beating to stop. He threw himself between beast and whip, and hugged the equine’s thick neck. This frail and sickly philosopher who gave us the Übermensch and slave morality, then collapsed, weeping.”(1) How odd that the man whose philosophy would bring the death of tens, even hundreds of millions of human beings and who decried the “soft” morals of Christianity, holding high the “hard” morals of the superman, would “lose it” just by seeing a horse beaten. Was not the beater of the horse simply exercising his own Übermensch morality? Indeed, who is to say that those who consider killing animals, especially for sport or food, “murder” are wrong? Further, who really cares? It’s all a matter of opinion. Consider this exchange between Richard Dawkins and Justin Brierley:

JB: When you make a value judgement don’t you immediately step yourself outside of this evolutionary process and say that the reason this is good is that it’s good. And you don’t have any way to stand on that statement.
RD: My value judgement itself could come from my evolutionary past.
JB: So therefore it’s just as random in a sense as any product of evolution.
RD: You could say that, it doesn’t in any case, nothing about it makes it more probable that there is anything supernatural.
JB: Ultimately, your belief that rape is wrong is as arbitrary as the fact that we’ve evolved five fingers rather than six.
RD: You could say that, yeah.(2)

Image result for nietzsche's insanity beating horse

There are plenty of other arguments for the existence of God. There are certainly a number of excellent apologists out there who do an excellent job offering a defense for the existence of God. What they will ALL say is, in the, end, the fundamental problem is spiritual, not physical, scientific, logical, rational, reasonable, etc., even though all of these were given to us by God as road maps, guides…tools, so to speak. I would submit that even if we do not always call him God, every one of us at some point in our lives accepts that he exists, but our will steps in the way. Our desires become greater than his. We become angry with him over injustices or cruelties or great evils, but never pause to think, “How did I know those things were evil in the first place?” We know what injustice looks like because we know what justice looks like; we know what cruelty looks like because we know what kindness and mercy look like; we know what evil looks like because we know what good looks like. But again, if there is no objective standard of these things outside of our own feelings and desires, then they are too easily whittled down into mere subjective opinions.

“In one of her letters, Helen (Keller) told Bishop Brooks that she had always known about God, even before she had any words. Even before she could call God anything, she knew God was there. She didn’t know what it was. God had no name for her — nothing had a name for her. She had no concept of a name. But in her darkness and isolation, she knew she was not alone. Someone was with her. She felt God’s love. And when she received the gift of language and heard about God, she said she already knew.” Phillips Brooks and Helen Keller

I am often asked, “If objective proof could be presented that God did not exist, would you become an atheist?” I won’t answer that here; I’ve answered it elsewhere and I’ve Gish-galloped enough, I think! But I would like to ask this question of the atheist: “If objective proof could be presented that Christianity were true, would you follow Jesus?”

*People will claim theists are arguing for “special pleading”: “Applying standards, principles, and/or rules to other people or circumstances, while making oneself or certain circumstances exempt from the same critical criteria, without providing adequate justification.”(3) We absolutely are. What, then, is the justification? Over and over again, throughout the Bible, we are informed that God is absolutely sui generis: “I am the LORD, and there is no other; apart from me there is no God.” (Isaiah 45:5); “To whom then will you liken God? Or what likeness will you compare with Him?” (Isaiah 23:19); “As the heavens are higher than the earth, so are my ways higher than your ways and my thoughts than your thoughts.” (Isaiah 55:9) None of this was established in “modern” times as a neat little philosophical trick to sidestep “enlightened” man’s desires for “scientific evidence” or “objective proof”; these writings are thousands of years old, accepted by people who were not always initially receptive to their message. The point is, IF there is a God, he is, again, BY NATUREabove, outside, beyond, entirely other than everything in his creation. Compare the Mycoplasma genitalium (which “has one of the smallest genomes of any free-living organism in the world, clocking in at a mere 525 genes [4]) with Homo sapiens, with approx. 21,000 genes. As immeasurably different as the two are, their differences pale in comparison to the differences between Creator God and everything else in his universe. Indeed, we have more in common with the singularity at the center of the black hole, J1342+0928, 13 billion light-years away than we do with God.

Related image

(1) Hugging the Horse’s Head

(2) The John Lennox – Richard Dawkins Debate

(3) https://www.logicallyfallacious….

(4) To Model the Simplest Microbe in the World, You Need 128 Computers